Strawson argues in 'The Bounds of Sense' that 'things in themselves' is an incoherent concept produced by illegitimately applying the category of existence beyond possible experience.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Incoherent(describing whether moral responsibility can exist): Logically impossible or contradictory; something that cannot make sense or cannot exist at the same time as something else.
Possible experience(describing the boundary of what we can know): In Kant's philosophy, anything that could potentially be observed or experienced by a human being within the limits of how human minds work.
Strawson: # Strawson Peter Strawson was a 20th-century British philosopher best known for challenging the traditional view that all meaningful statements must be either true or false. He argued that some statements—like "The present King of France is bald"—are neither true nor false because they fail to properly refer to anything that exists. His work fundamentally changed how philosophers think about language, meaning, and logic.
The Bounds of Sense(the name of the objection): Strawson's famous criticism of Kant, arguing that Kant's theory has an internal contradiction or logical problem.

Based on where you are in your exploration