Strawson's reactive attitudes account shows that moral responsibility is grounded in interpersonal relationships and participant stances, not metaphysical freedom from determination.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Metaphysical freedom(as Kant's proposed solution to the free will problem): The idea that humans have a kind of freedom that exists at a deep level of reality—not just the practical ability to do what we want, but a fundamental freedom from being completely determined by physical causes.
Participant stances(as opposed to objective observation): The perspective you have when you're actively involved in relationships with others, as opposed to standing back and observing them coldly from the outside.
Strawson: # Strawson Peter Strawson was a 20th-century British philosopher best known for challenging the traditional view that all meaningful statements must be either true or false. He argued that some statements—like "The present King of France is bald"—are neither true nor false because they fail to properly refer to anything that exists. His work fundamentally changed how philosophers think about language, meaning, and logic.
determination(Used to explain supervenience-like dependency between entities or properties)

Based on where you are in your exploration