Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Stroud's 1968 critique of transcendental arguments has no... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Stroud's transcendental argument can at best establish a version of the causal theory in which 'independent' is read in a transcendentally ideal sense, not a fully mind-independent realist sense.

    Stroud's 1968 critique of transcendental arguments has not been answered by the argument Stroud now advances with Brueckner's assistance.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Perception2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Stroud's transcendental argument can at best establish a version of the causal t...The term 'independent' in the argument's conclusion must be read in a transcende...

    Similar

    Stroud's (1968) criticism targets transcendental arguments that only e...85%Kant's transcendental argument was designed to answer Hume's skepticis...84%Stroud's objection to transcendental arguments is not limited to the s...83%Strawson's transcendental argument is susceptible to Stroud's line of ...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: kant-transcendental
    View source passageHide passage
    From this one might be tempted to conclude that despite his critique of 1968, Stroud, with Brueckner’s assistance, has found a transcendental argument that does in fact establish a conclusion about the external world. However, so far nothing has been said to turn back Stroud’s 1968 critique, and it seems much more likely that the argument Stroud now advances can at best conclude with a version of CT in which the term “independent” must be read in a transcendentally ideal sense – in which, for ex

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective