Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Stroud's transcendental argument can at best establish a ... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Stroud's transcendental argument can at best establish a version of the causal theory in which 'independent' is read in a transcendentally ideal sense, not a fully mind-independent realist sense.

    PerceptionSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    2 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kant's transcendental idealism entails that 'mind-independence' can only be coherently established relative to our constitutive epistemic frameworks, not absolutely.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Stroud's own 1977 argument concedes that transcendental arguments yield conclusions about how we must represent the world, not about world-as-it-is-in-itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Any causal theory whose 'independence' claim outstrips transcendental idealist constraints collapses into the very Cartesian skepticism Stroud's argument was designed to refute.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Putnam's internal realism demonstrates that object-independence is always indexed to a conceptual scheme, making fully mind-independent realism semantically unstable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If 'independent' in the causal theory's conclusion requires scheme-transcendent reference, no transcendental argument—including Stroud's—can supply the verification conditions for that claim.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Stroud's 1968 critique of transcendental arguments has not been answered by the argument Stroud now advances with Brueckner's assistance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The term 'independent' in the argument's conclusion must be read in a transcendentally ideal sense — one in which the nature of physical objects is determined by our best scientific theories and sensory experiences can be in error about those objects.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    SkepticismPerception

    Key Terms

    Stroud(referring to a specific philosopher's argument)
    Barry Stroud is a philosopher who has written about knowledge and skepticism—he questions whether we can really know things about the world, and his work often focuses on the limits of human understanding.
    Transcendentally ideal(This term modifies what 'independent' means—it's saying objects are independent of individual human minds, but not independent of human experience and scientific understanding altogether.)
    A philosophical idea that objects and reality exist in a way shaped by how human minds experience and understand them, rather than existing in some completely separate way we can never access.
    causal theory(what Stroud's argument attempts to establish)
    A theory about how we know things: the idea that we gain knowledge about the world because objects cause effects on our senses (like light bouncing off a apple into your eyes).
    mind-independent(Used to classify objects such as tables and chairs.)
    An object is mind-independent if its existence does not, by its very nature, depend on being the object or content of mental states, i.e., it could survive the annihilation of all thinking things.
    realist sense(contrasted with transcendentally ideal)
    The straightforward meaning of something existing completely on its own, without any dependence on human minds or thinking at all.
    transcendental argument(Kant's method for establishing a priori knowledge of the categories)
    An argument that proceeds by identifying the necessary preconditions for the possibility of experience

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    Any causal theory whose 'independence' claim outstrips transcendental idealist c...If 'independent' in the causal theory's conclusion requires scheme-transcendent ...Kant's transcendental idealism entails that 'mind-independence' can only be cohe...Putnam's internal realism demonstrates that object-independence is always indexe...

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: kant-transcendental
    View source passageHide passage
    From this one might be tempted to conclude that despite his critique of 1968, Stroud, with Brueckner’s assistance, has found a transcendental argument that does in fact establish a conclusion about the external world. However, so far nothing has been said to turn back Stroud’s 1968 critique, and it seems much more likely that the argument Stroud now advances can at best conclude with a version of CT in which the term “independent” must be read in a transcendentally ideal sense – in which, for ex
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    +3 moreShow less
    Stroud's 1968 critique of transcendental arguments has not been answered by the ...Stroud's own 1977 argument concedes that transcendental arguments yield conclusi...The term 'independent' in the argument's conclusion must be read in a transcende...

    Similar

    The term 'independent' in the argument's conclusion must be read in a ...87%If 'independent' in the argument's conclusion must be read in a transc...87%Strawson's transcendental argument in The Bounds of Sense concludes on...85%Stroud's (1968) criticism targets transcendental arguments that only e...82%
    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (2 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit