Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Subjective consciousness alone cannot serve as the ultima... — Carmelics
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The ultimate place of encounter between subjects and objects must be where persons and things essentially and existentially come to be and pass away.

    Subjective consciousness alone cannot serve as the ultimate ground of encounter between subjects and objects, since it is limited to appearances.

    Consciousness & MindNatural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural TheologyConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Natural Theology
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The ultimate ground must be the place of birth and death, not merely of intellec...The ultimate ground must encompass not merely accidental categorical changes but...The ultimate place of encounter between subjects and objects must be where perso...

    Similar

    When consciousness has no objects to illumine, no intentional experien...86%Witnessing consciousness cannot be made an object of consciousness.86%If consciousness can apprehend non-existing entities, then consciousne...85%Contact between consciousness and sense objects cannot be prevented so...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: kyoto-school
    View source passageHide passage
    Ultimately, however, there is a crucial limit to the subjective “field of consciousness.” As Kant demonstrated, subjective consciousness cannot reflect things as they are in themselves, but only as they appear when schematized according to subjective categories. What, then, is the ultimate place wherein the encounter between subjects and objects takes place, wherein persons and things coexist? According to Nishida, this must be the place wherein persons and things not only undergo changes in acc

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective