Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Subpersonal biasing mechanisms that generate non-intentio... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Non-intentional accounts of self-deception that deny the contradictory belief requirement should not suppose that self-deceivers are typically responsible for their self-deception.

    Subpersonal biasing mechanisms that generate non-intentional self-deception operate independently of the agent's moral reasons-tracking system, bypassing it rather than corrupting it.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Biasing mechanisms(in epistemology (study of knowledge))
    Built-in tendencies in your thinking that push you toward certain conclusions or beliefs, often without you realizing it.
    Corrupting(in epistemology, contrasted with 'bypassing')
    Damaging or tainting something from within so it no longer works properly—like how a virus corrupts a computer program.
    Moral reasons-tracking system(in ethics and philosophy of mind)
    Your conscious ability to recognize ethical principles and understand why something is right or wrong, and then act on that understanding.
    Non-intentional(as a description of how processes work without needing a conscious agent directing them)
    Not guided by a mind, plan, goal, or purpose; happening automatically through natural laws rather than deliberate design.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Self-deception(Zhu Xi's account of wrongdoing)
    Allowing oneself to ignore the promptings of one's moral sense and become motivated solely by physical desires
    Subpersonal(as used in philosophy of mind)
    Happening below the level of the whole person—brain processes or mental activity that occur without your conscious awareness or control.
    agent(Economics terminology applied to medical ethics)
    The party in a principal-agent relationship who is instructed to produce the good or service on the principal's behalf — in the medical context, the doctor
    bypassing(Contrasted with determinism; the author treats bypassing as a distinct concept that people mistakenly conflate with determinism.)
    A condition in which mental states have no causal impact on behavior — behavior occurs independently of, or around, mental states.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Non-intentional accounts of self-deception that deny the contradictory belief re...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective