Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Swinburne argues that miracle testimony can itself serve ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A categorical cumulative argument for a miracle claim depends on the overall balance of natural theology and atheological arguments such as the problem of evil

    Swinburne argues that miracle testimony can itself serve as evidence for God's existence, making the relationship between theism and miracles mutually reinforcing rather than unidirectional.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Testimony of consistent, well-attested miracles provides empirical data independent of prior theological commitments about God's nature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God exists and acts in history, miracle reports should accumulate as evidence; dismissing all testimony begs the question against theism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Bayesian reasoning allows prior probability of theism to rationally increase when miracle evidence emerges, creating legitimate mutual reinforcement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Miracle testimony is inherently unreliable; human cognitive biases and misreporting are better explanations than violations of natural law.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The claim becomes circular: accepting miracles as evidence for God requires already having a theistic framework to interpret anomalies religiously.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Competing religions cite incompatible miracles as evidence for their gods, making the method systematically unable to adjudicate between worldviews.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Evidence(Distinguished from prior/intrinsic probability in the context of the low priors argument)
    Factors extrinsic to a hypothesis that raise or lower its probability
    Miracle testimony(as evidence that might support belief in God)
    Reports or accounts from people who claim to have witnessed a miracle—an event that seems to break the laws of nature and can't be explained by ordinary causes.
    Swinburne(in philosophy of religion)
    Richard Swinburne, a famous British philosopher who wrote about God, religion, and the problem of evil—he argued that God's existence can be rationally defended despite the existence of evil in the world.
    Unidirectional(contrasting with how miracles and theism actually relate to each other)
    Moving or working in only one direction; the opposite of a two-way street where both sides influence each other.
    mutually reinforcing(in argumentation)
    When two or more things support and strengthen each other, making each one more believable or powerful when combined.
    theism(Distinguished from monotheism as a weaker claim about the number of divine beings.)
    The position that at least one god exists.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Natural Theology1 linked

    Related

    A categorical cumulative argument for a miracle claim depends on the overall bal...Bayesian reasoning allows prior probability of theism to rationally increase whe...Competing religions cite incompatible miracles as evidence for their gods, makin...If God exists and acts in history, miracle reports should accumulate as evidence...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    +3 moreShow less
    Miracle testimony is inherently unreliable; human cognitive biases and misreport...Testimony of consistent, well-attested miracles provides empirical data independ...The claim becomes circular: accepting miracles as evidence for God requires alre...