Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Testimony of consistent, well-attested miracles provides ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Swinburne argues that miracle testimony can itself serve as evidence for God's existence, making the relationship between theism and miracles mutually reinforcing rather than unidirectional.

    Testimony of consistent, well-attested miracles provides empirical data independent of prior theological commitments about God's nature.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    Swinburne argues that miracle testimony can itself serve as evidence for God's e...

    Related

    Swinburne argues that miracle testimony can itself serve as evidence for God's e...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective