Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The alleged epistemic asymmetry between beliefs and appea... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Seemings or appearances are distinct from beliefs.

    The alleged epistemic asymmetry between beliefs and appearances dissolves if normative assessment applies to how one deploys concepts in perceptual uptake, as Sellars's argument implies.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Appearances(Kantian transcendental idealism)
    Objects as they are given through sensible intuition and structured by the categories, as opposed to things in themselves (objects as they are independently of human cognition).
    Beliefs
    Beliefs are the things you accept as true based on your experiences, what others have told you, or what makes sense to you—even if you don't have complete proof. They shape how you see the world and influence your decisions, from everyday choices to major life directions. Unlike facts that can be verified, beliefs are personal and can differ from person to person.
    Deploy concepts(as in 'how one deploys concepts in perceptual uptake')
    To put ideas or categories to use; specifically here, to apply mental categories when you're directly perceiving something.
    Epistemic
    "Epistemic" relates to knowledge—how we know things, what counts as knowledge, and whether we can trust what we believe to be true. It comes from the Greek word for knowledge and is used to describe questions about the reliability and validity of our beliefs and understanding. For example, "epistemic humility" means acknowledging the limits of what you can actually know for certain.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Normative assessment(refers to assessing God morally or ethically)
    Judging something according to standards of what is right, wrong, good, or bad—making a moral or ethical evaluation.
    Perceptual uptake(as the target of normative assessment)
    The process of taking in information through your senses and turning it into meaningful experience.
    Sellars
    Wilfrid Sellars was an influential 20th-century American philosopher who fundamentally changed how we think about knowledge, perception, and meaning. He argued that our scientific understanding of the world and our everyday experiences of it aren't separate things but need to be brought together into one coherent picture. His ideas, particularly about how language relates to reality and how we know things, continue to shape modern philosophy.
    asymmetry(Modal logic frame semantics)
    A frame property expressible in hybrid logic by the formula c→□¬◇c, meaning if world x accesses world y, then y does not access x.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedPerception1 linked

    Related

    Seemings or appearances are distinct from beliefs.

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective