Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The analyticity claim conflates the normativity of practi... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Rational agents must take the means to their ends

    The analyticity claim conflates the normativity of practical reason with a merely descriptive psychological connection between volition and action.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Normativity requires 'oughtness'—a prescriptive force that mere psychological facts about how minds work cannot provide.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.That an agent desires X and believes X promotes their goal doesn't logically entail they ought to pursue X without additional normative premises.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If analyticity held, akratic action (wanting A while judging B better) would be conceptually impossible, yet it plainly occurs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The distinction between descriptive and normative may collapse for rational agents: rationality itself constitutes a normative standard.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Practical reason's normativity emerges from the internal logic of goal-directed agency, not from external moral facts—making analyticity coherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Akrasia involves contradictory judgments about action, not refutation of volition-action analytics; it reflects weakness of will, not conceptual error.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Virtue Ethics1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Akrasia involves contradictory judgments about action, not refutation of volitio...If analyticity held, akratic action (wanting A while judging B better) would be ...Normativity requires 'oughtness'—a prescriptive force that mere psychological fa...Practical reason's normativity emerges from the internal logic of goal-directed ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Rational agents must take the means to their endsThat an agent desires X and believes X promotes their goal doesn't logically ent...The distinction between descriptive and normative may collapse for rational agen...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit