Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The analyticity claim conflates the normativity of practical reason with a merely descriptive psychological connection between volition and action.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The distinction between descriptive and normative may collapse for rational agents: rationality itself constitutes a normative standard.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Practical reason's normativity emerges from the internal logic of goal-directed agency, not from external moral facts—making analyticity coherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Akrasia involves contradictory judgments about action, not refutation of volition-action analytics; it reflects weakness of will, not conceptual error.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Normativity requires 'oughtness'—a prescriptive force that mere psychological facts about how minds work cannot provide.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.That an agent desires X and believes X promotes their goal doesn't logically entail they ought to pursue X without additional normative premises.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If analyticity held, akratic action (wanting A while judging B better) would be conceptually impossible, yet it plainly occurs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.