The argument proves too much: by its logic, no normative framework from any tradition could achieve impartiality, making cross-cultural justice discourse impossible rather than merely liberal-biased.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Normative framework(the broader system of rules that might underlie moral language): A set of rules or standards about how things *should* be or *ought* to be done, rather than how they actually are.
The argument proves too much(logic/argumentation): A logical problem where a reasoning strategy is so strong that it reaches conclusions much broader than intended—it defeats the theory it was meant to defend.
cross-cultural justice discourse(as used in political philosophy): Conversations and debates between people from different cultures about what fairness and justice should look like across societies with different values and traditions.
impartiality(Attributed to utilitarianism as a core commitment): The requirement to give equal weight to the welfare of all people regardless of one's personal relationship to them

Based on where you are in your exploration