Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The asymmetry between mental and physical explanation is ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The asymmetry between mental and physical explanation is accounted for by the greater leniency of physical constitutive principles, not by rationality's uncodifiability

    CausationConsciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Physical constitutive principles are far more lenient than rationality, allowing for a greater variety of empirical content
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.This leniency accounts for an important asymmetry between mental and physical explanation
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This asymmetry point is entirely separable from McDowell's distinctive claim that rationality is uncodifiable
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & MindCausation

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Physical constitutive principles are far more lenient than rationality, allowing...This asymmetry point is entirely separable from McDowell's distinctive claim tha...This leniency accounts for an important asymmetry between mental and physical ex...

    Similar

    The asymmetry between mental and physical explanation is separable fro...95%This leniency accounts for an important asymmetry between mental and p...85%Davidson holds that there are constitutive a priori principles underly...84%One can hold that rationality is constitutive, normative, and asymmetr...84%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: anomalous-monism
    View source passageHide passage
    If, however, the emphasis here falls on constitutive principles in particular—as surely it must—then two other problems arise. First, McDowell’s reasoning doesn’t tell us what exactly it is about such principles that makes them resistant to reduction, since, as we’ve just seen, that reasoning has failed to distinguish them from empirical concepts in the physical sciences. And second, as noted in 4.2, Davidson holds that there are constitutive a priori principles underlying the physical science
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit