Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The asymmetry between mental and physical explanation is accounted for by the greater leniency of physical constitutive principles, not by rationality's uncodifiability

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Physical constitutive principles are far more lenient than rationality, allowing for a greater variety of empirical content
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.This leniency accounts for an important asymmetry between mental and physical explanation
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This asymmetry point is entirely separable from McDowell's distinctive claim that rationality is uncodifiable
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consciousness & Mind
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.