Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The axiom of choice is necessary and sufficient for the e... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The equivalence of Hintikka's game-theoretic definition of truth and Tarski's definition of truth is itself equivalent to the axiom of choice (given the other axioms of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory).

    The axiom of choice is necessary and sufficient for the equivalence between game-theoretic and Tarskian truth definitions within ZF set theory.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    The argument that player ∃'s winning strategies for G(∀x φ(x)) can be assembled ...The equivalence of Hintikka's game-theoretic definition of truth and Tarski's de...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The equivalence of Hintikka's game-theoretic definition of truth and T...94%The non-equivalence of the Tarski definition and the Hintikka definiti...85%The axiom of choice is vindicated by the correct explication of truth.84%The axiom of choice is needed precisely because of this determinism as...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-games
    View source passageHide passage
    One can prove that for any first-order sentence \(\phi\), interpreted in a fixed structure \(A\), player \(\exists\) has a winning strategy for Hintikka’s game \(G(\phi)\) if and only if \(\phi\) is true in \(A\) in the sense of Tarski. Two features of this proof are interesting. First, if \(\phi\) is any first-order sentence then the game \(G(\phi)\) has finite length, and so the Gale-Stewart theorem tells us that it is determined. We infer that \(\exists\) has a winning strategy in exactly one

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective