Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The axiom of choice is needed precisely because of this d... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The non-equivalence of the Tarski definition and the Hintikka definition of truth (when the axiom of choice fails) is not due to the use of games in the Hintikka definition, but due to the assumption that strategies are deterministic.

    The axiom of choice is needed precisely because of this determinism assumption, not because of the use of games per se.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A nondeterministic (quasistrategy) translation of the Tarski definition into gam...The Hintikka definition of truth assumes strategies are deterministic (single-va...The non-equivalence of the Tarski definition and the Hintikka definition of trut...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    The axiom of choice is necessary and sufficient for the equivalence be...83%Deterministic strategies require the axiom of choice.82%The non-equivalence of the Tarski definition and the Hintikka definiti...79%The argument that player ∃'s winning strategies for G(∀x φ(x)) can be ...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-games
    View source passageHide passage
    It’s puzzling that we have here two theories of when a sentence is true, and the theories are not equivalent if the axiom of choice fails. In fact the reason is not very deep. The axiom of choice is needed not because the Hintikka definition uses games, but because it assumes that strategies are deterministic, i.e. that they are single-valued functions giving the user no choice of options. A more natural way of translating the Tarski definition into game terms is to use nondeterministic strategi

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective