Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The beauty associated with an ideal cannot be a vague, indeterminate beauty, but must be a beauty fixed by a concept of objective purposiveness.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.For Kant, free beauty (pulchritudo vaga) is precisely beautiful without any concept of what the object ought to be, yet remains genuinely beautiful.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The demand that ideal beauty require objective purposiveness conflates adherent beauty with the purer, concept-independent aesthetic judgment Kant distinguishes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Fixing beauty by a determinate concept subordinates aesthetic judgment to cognitive or teleological criteria, violating the disinterested autonomy of taste.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Schiller argues in the Aesthetic Letters that the highest beauty arises from a free play of form that resists reduction to any fixed rational concept or purpose.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A beauty 'fixed by concept' would be a beauty determined by the understanding, but Schiller holds that such determination destroys the living unity characteristic of genuine aesthetic experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.An ideal of beauty is sought in relation to a specific concept of what the object ought to be.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A concept of objective purposiveness fixes what counts as beautiful for that kind of object.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Vague beauty lacks the determinacy required to serve as a standard or ideal.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.