Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The choice of either incomparable alternative is justified under the theory of maximization.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Maximization requires a complete ordering of alternatives, but incomparability signals the absence of any ordering relation, not a neutral one.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If no ordering relation holds between two options, maximization is undefined rather than permissive, since the theory presupposes comparability to function.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Ruth Chang argues that incomparable items stand in a fourth value relation ('on a par') distinct from better, worse, or equal, which standard maximization frameworks fail to accommodate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A theory of justified choice that cannot distinguish 'on a par' from 'incomparable' lacks the normative precision needed to vindicate either choice as justified rather than merely arbitrary.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Maximization as a theory of justified choice only requires the choice of an alternative that is not worse than other alternatives.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Incomparable alternatives are not worse than one another.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.