Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The Christian mystical practice lacks full epistemic legi... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The Christian mystical practice lacks full epistemic legitimacy.

    Religious ExperienceSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The override system of the Christian mystical practice is constructed from guidelines drawn from the history of the practice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Those historical guidelines were compromised by androcentric bias and outdated scientific beliefs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Guidelines compromised by bias and false beliefs detract from a practice's epistemic legitimacy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismReligious Experience

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Related

    Guidelines compromised by bias and false beliefs detract from a practice's epist...The override system of the Christian mystical practice is constructed from guide...Those historical guidelines were compromised by androcentric bias and outdated s...

    Similar

    Guidelines compromised by bias and false beliefs detract from a practi...78%It is too much to claim metaphysical knowledge of things-in-themselves...78%It is practically rational to engage in mystical/numinous doxastic pra...78%Alston's inference from practical rationality to epistemic rationality...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: mysticism
    View source passageHide passage
    Most objections to Alston are equally objections to the Argument from Experience or come from general epistemological complaints. Objections that apply specifically to Alston include Jonathan Kvanvig’s (1994) faulting of Alston for a loose employment of “rationality.” He argues that no one meaning of that term can do the work Alston does with it. Another objection is that Alston moves from “It is practically rational to engage in a Christian doxastic practice” to “It is rational for me to believ
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit