Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The coercion-based argument cannot explain why distributi... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The coercion-based argument cannot explain why distributive equality should be required within but not across national borders.

    Democracy & GovernanceRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The picture of coercion constricting autonomy and thereby grounding compensation obligations is not sustainable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If that picture is not sustainable, it cannot serve as the explanatory foundation for limiting equality requirements to within national borders.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertyDemocracy & Governance

    Connections

    1 topic

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    If that picture is not sustainable, it cannot serve as the explanatory foundatio...The picture of coercion constricting autonomy and thereby grounding compensation...

    Similar

    The requirement for egalitarian justification of state coercion is lim...80%The justification for state coercion must include a requirement that t...77%The case for strong equality or the difference principle is triggered ...76%Nothing in the justification of coercive states restricts protected ri...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: egalitarianism
    View source passageHide passage
    A difficulty with this view is that imposition of a massively coercive scheme either need pose no threat to individual autonomy or if it does pose a threat, does so only in circumstances in which the autonomy that is downgraded is worth very little. The law issues credible coercive threats that if, for example, I were to murder someone, I would be arrested, prosecuted, and subjected to capital punishment or a long prison sentence. If I have no desire whatsoever to murder anyone, the coercion sit
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit