Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The communications-engineer perspective treats as wastefu... — Carmelics
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→At least some problems with the early/late debate stem from an assumption about the linearity of the processes that support personal-level thinking, not from an assumption about linearity of neural processing per se.

    The communications-engineer perspective treats as wasteful the idea that physical properties already represented must be re-represented in a parallel system to support conscious access.

    Consciousness & MindPerception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionConsciousness & Mind

    Key Terms

    Communications-engineer perspective(as used in philosophy of mind)
    A way of thinking about the mind that borrows ideas from engineering and information science, focusing on how efficiently information is processed and transmitted in the brain.
    Conscious access(as the limitation placed on unconscious representations)
    The ability to become aware of something or know it's happening in your mind—if you have no conscious access to something, you can't think about it or know about it.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Parallel system(as used in theories of consciousness)
    A separate, independent system running alongside another one at the same time, rather than a single unified system.
    Physical properties(as used in philosophy of physics)
    Characteristics of objects that exist in the physical world, like mass, color, size, or temperature—things you could theoretically measure or observe.
    Re-represented(as used in discussing how information is handled by the brain)
    Presented or expressed again in a different form or system, rather than just once.

    Related

    At least some problems with the early/late debate stem from an assumption about ...This assumption about linearity of personal-level processes is what drives the e...This perspective generates an assumption that the processes supporting personal-...

    Similar

    Access to physical properties may require those properties to be repre...73%Non-reductive physicalism denies that conceptual tools appropriate for...69%If consciousness is not necessitated by physical properties, physicali...67%The mind-as-physical-symbol-system view is undermined by connectionist...67%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: attention
    View source passageHide passage
    A reason why assumptions about linearity may have been problematic is that when, following Broadbent, we think about hierarchical perceptual processing while bearing in mind the communications engineer’s concerns about capacity limitations, it then becomes natural to make some additional assumptions about the way in which this hierarchically organized architecture supports personal-level cognition. The early/late debate’s problems are more plausibly blamed on these additional assumptions, rather

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective