Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The concept of disease necessarily requires that a condit... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The concept of disease necessarily requires that a condition have a causal history involving abnormal biological systems.

    Bioethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Common sense understanding of human biology distinguishes between pathological and non-pathological versions of the same outward phenomena.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome is considered a disease not merely because aging is undesirable, but because it differs from normal aging in a way that must be caused by some underlying pathology.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Naturalism insists that disease involves a causal process that includes biological abnormalities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Boorse's biostatistical theory grounds disease in species-typical functional deviation, not causal history per se.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A condition arising from entirely normal biological processes can still constitute disease if it impairs species-typical function.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Menopause and senescence involve no abnormal biological systems yet remain contested disease candidates under causal-history views.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Nordenfelt's welfare theory defines disease by reference to the agent's inability to achieve vital goals, not by etiology.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Two conditions with identical causal histories but differing social contexts can diverge in disease status, undermining causal-history necessity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    BioethicsPhilosophy of Language

    Connections

    1 topic

    Causation1 linked

    Related

    A condition arising from entirely normal biological processes can still constitu...Boorse's biostatistical theory grounds disease in species-typical functional dev...Common sense understanding of human biology distinguishes between pathological a...Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome is considered a disease not merely because ...
    +4 moreShow less
    Menopause and senescence involve no abnormal biological systems yet remain conte...Naturalism insists that disease involves a causal process that includes biologic...Nordenfelt's welfare theory defines disease by reference to the agent's inabilit...Two conditions with identical causal histories but differing social contexts can...

    Similar

    Naturalism insists that disease involves a causal process that include...89%A good causal condition must align with intuitions about what causes d...82%Our concept of disorder could be naturalist even if no actual diseases...80%Philosophers should aim to naturalize disease by first understanding g...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: health-disease
    View source passageHide passage
    Naturalism embodies the important insight that we do in fact think that disease involves a causal process that includes biological abnormalities. It does not mean, however, that all diseases have to receive the same biological explanation. The class of diseases will include a variety of different conditions that receive different causal explanations. That is, even if diseases are natural kinds, the superordinate category of disease may not be. Not just any sort of story about the causes of abnor
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit