Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The content of mental states cannot always be constituted... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The content of mental states cannot always be constituted by Fregean senses alone

    Consciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Demonstrative and indexical expressions such as 'I', 'here', and 'now' refer directly to public objects in the world
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The content of states reported using such expressions is partly constituted by those external objects, not purely by internal senses
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    1 topic

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Perception1 linked

    Related

    Demonstrative and indexical expressions such as 'I', 'here', and 'now' refer dir...The content of states reported using such expressions is partly constituted by t...

    Similar

    The contents of mental states are not themselves mental states.85%Indeterminacy in the ascription of mental states and meanings is unavo...83%If mental states merely supervene on physiological states, mental stat...82%Whatever possibly exists in the absence of all mental states is mind-i...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: consciousness-intentionality
    View source passageHide passage
    The development of externalist conceptions of intentionality informs the reception of Russell’s legacy in contemporary philosophy of mind as well. Russell also helped to put in play a conception of the intentionality of mental states, according to which each such state is seen as involving the individual’s “acquaintance with a proposition” (counterpart to Fregean “grasping”)—which proposition is at once both what is understood in understanding expressions by which the state of mind is reported,
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit