Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The content of mental states cannot always be constituted by Fregean senses alone
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Demonstrative and indexical expressions such as 'I', 'here', and 'now' refer directly to public objects in the world
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The content of states reported using such expressions is partly constituted by those external objects, not purely by internal senses
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Browse more in Philosophy of Language
Related propositions within the same area of thought.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42