Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The derivation depends on that reduction being valid — Carmelics
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The frequentist derivation requires that r be a deterministic (non-random) quantity

    The derivation depends on that reduction being valid

    CausationTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    CausationTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Modality & Possibility
    1 linked

    Related

    If r were a random quantity, the reduction of E[r · E[h]] to r · E[h] in line (2...The frequentist derivation requires that r be a deterministic (non-random) quant...

    Similar

    This procedure constitutes a valid Turing reduction of A to B82%The original sentence φ is valid if and only if the Σ¹₁-sentence (θ → ...76%A reduction of a concept cannot legitimately presuppose that concept i...75%If A reduces to B and B reduces to C, then A reduces to C.75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: bounded-rationality
    View source passageHide passage
    Note that the frequentist assumption that r is a deterministic process is necessary for the derivation to go through; for if r were a random quantity, the reduction of \(\mathbb{E} \left[ r \cdot \mathbb{E} \left[ h \right] \right]\) to \( r \cdot \mathbb{E} \left[ h \right]\) in line (2) would be invalid.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective