Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The Derridean slide from 'in principle shareable' to 'always already shared' commits a modal fallacy, confusing possibility with actuality in a way that would also dissolve meaningful distinctions like public/private and disclosure/concealment.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Derrida denies a clean in-principle/actual divide; language's iterability means 'shareable' already constitutes structural belonging to alterity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The critique assumes 'shared' means 'consciously accessed,' but structural shareability doesn't require conscious actualization of content.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Public/private remain operationally meaningful even if their metaphysical foundations are unstable, so the distinction need not dissolve entirely.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Modal distinctions (possible vs. actual) are logically foundational; collapsing them undermines rigorous philosophical argumentation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If 'shareable in principle' entails 'already shared,' then private thoughts become conceptually incoherent, contradicting lived experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Derrida's move treats potentiality as actuality without argument, a sleight-of-hand that avoids rather than solves the problem.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.