- Always already shared(Where the argument supposedly jumps to without justification)
- Something that is *inevitably* or *by necessity* shared from the moment it exists, not just capable of being shared.
- Derrida / Derridean(The statement refers to an argument Derrida made about how meaning works)
- Jacques Derrida was a 20th-century French philosopher who developed a way of reading texts called 'deconstruction,' which looks for hidden contradictions and unstated assumptions in writing and thinking.
- Disclosure/concealment(Another example of a meaningful difference the fallacy would destroy)
- Disclosure means revealing or making something known; concealment means hiding it or keeping it secret.
- Dissolve (meaningful distinctions)(What the fallacy supposedly does to important categories)
- To make something disappear or become meaningless—here, to erase the real difference between two separate concepts.
- In principle shareable(The starting point of the argument being criticized)
- Something that could *theoretically* or *by its nature* be shared with others, even if it hasn't been shared yet.
- Possibility vs. actuality(The two different things the argument supposedly confuses)
- Possibility means something *could* happen or *could* be true; actuality means it *really does* happen or *really is* true right now.
- Public/private distinction(An example of a meaningful difference the fallacy would destroy)
- The difference between things meant for everyone to know (public) versus things meant to stay hidden or personal (private).
- modal fallacy(Epistemology and modal logic)
- An invalid inference resulting from illicit substitution of a non-rigid designator into a modal context, producing a false conclusion from true premises