Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The distinction between truth-skepticism and epistemologi... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Skepticism about moral truth is distinct from all kinds of epistemological moral skepticism.

    The distinction between truth-skepticism and epistemological skepticism is therefore not robust under error-theoretic metaethics, where metaphysical and epistemic failure are co-extensive.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Epistemic
    "Epistemic" relates to knowledge—how we know things, what counts as knowledge, and whether we can trust what we believe to be true. It comes from the Greek word for knowledge and is used to describe questions about the reliability and validity of our beliefs and understanding. For example, "epistemic humility" means acknowledging the limits of what you can actually know for certain.
    Epistemological skepticism(theory of knowledge)
    The philosophical position that we can't have reliable knowledge about the world, or that knowledge is impossible or severely limited.
    Error-theoretic metaethics(ethics/metaethics)
    A theory about morality claiming that all moral statements are false because moral facts don't actually exist.
    Metaethics(as the general field this statement appears in)
    The branch of philosophy that asks questions about morality itself—like whether moral truths actually exist, or what makes something right or wrong.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Robust(in the discussion of mathematical properties)
    Strong, reliable, and stable—something that doesn't break or change significantly when conditions vary slightly.
    Truth-skepticism(epistemology/skepticism)
    The view that we can't know whether our beliefs about what's true are actually correct.
    co-extensive(The relation bridge laws establish between social and individualist descriptions)
    Having the same reference; two descriptions are co-extensive when they pick out the same entities or phenomena
    metaphysical(Ayer's Logical Positivist usage)
    Language that purports to refer beyond the physical world and lacks empirical consequences, which Ayer classifies as not literally significant

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Skepticism about moral truth is distinct from all kinds of epistemological moral...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective