Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The divine light, on the Quakers' view, cannot be God. — Carmelics
    Home/Against an attribute of God
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Quakers' divine light is a creature, not God.

    The divine light, on the Quakers' view, cannot be God.

    Against an aspect of GodAgainst an attribute of God
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Against an attribute of GodAgainst an aspect of God

    Connections

    3 topics

    Proof of definition segments2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Against an attribute of God
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Modality & Possibility
    1 linked
    Divine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    God and creatures are the only two possibilities for existing things.The Quakers' divine light is a creature, not God.Therefore, the divine light must be a creature.

    Similar

    The Quakers' divine light cannot be the source of necessary and eterna...88%The Quakers' divine light is a creature, not God.84%Therefore, the divine light must be a creature.82%The Quakers' divine light is material, not spiritual.82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: john-norris
    View source passageHide passage
    Norris was familiar with Roger Barclay and George Keith's expositions of Quakerism, and argued against the view in Reflections upon the Conduct of Human Life. The Quakers had an affinity for the ideal philosophy because they believed the divine light that enlightens the human mind supported their view. Norris delineates the many differences between Quaker thought and his own, but perhaps the main difference is: “The Quakers represent this light within as a sort of Extraordinary Inspiration (when

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective