Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The existence and authority of a king cannot be established through syllogistic argument alone when only indirect evidence (such as the justice of a people) is available, warranting suspension of judgment.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The Khazar king recognizes there is no compelling evidence or argument to establish that the justice of India's people is due to their king.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The Khazar king recognizes there is no compelling evidence that India even has a king.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Without compelling evidence, the rational response is to suspend judgment rather than affirm or deny.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.