Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The experiences of other individuals cannot, as such, for... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Absolute idealism is true — there exists a single trans-historical corporate mind of which particular finite minds are proper parts.

    The experiences of other individuals cannot, as such, form a common and larger set of experiences, because if the content and truth conditions of thoughts depend on relations within a single consciousness, then different individuals would have incommensurable experiences and thoughts.

    Consciousness & MindPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageConsciousness & Mind

    Key Terms

    Content (of thoughts)(used to explain what makes one thought different from another)
    The actual meaning or subject matter of what you're thinking about—basically, what your thought is about.
    Relations within a single consciousness(used to explain what gives individual thoughts their meaning)
    The connections and patterns between different thoughts and experiences happening inside one person's mind.
    Truth conditions

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (used to describe how we determine whether a thought accurately represents reality)
    The specific circumstances or facts that would make a statement true or false—what has to be the case for a thought to be correct.
    consciousness(Philosophy of mind; framing the 'What is consciousness?' question)
    A dynamic process characterized by self-transforming flow, intentional coherence, and semantic self-understanding, rather than a static or momentary state.
    incommensurable(The side and diagonal of a cube are incommensurable, posing a problem for minima theory)
    Two magnitudes whose ratio cannot be expressed as a ratio of whole numbers

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge3 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    A single trans-historical corporate mind of which finite minds are proper parts ...Absolute idealism is true — there exists a single trans-historical corporate min...By the same logic, systematic individual error must be explained against the bac...Knowledge and inquiry presuppose the possibility of error, including systematic ...
    +2 moreShow less
    The idealist explains local individual error against the background of larger pa...This larger pattern of experience must lie outside individual consciousness.

    Similar

    If the content and truth conditions of an individual's thoughts are de...85%The experience of the same (thinking about oneself) is inseparable fro...84%This larger pattern of experience must lie outside individual consciou...82%Perceptual experiences are not intersubjectively accessible in the sam...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: green
    View source passageHide passage
    Green’s main argument for this form of absolute idealism seems to be his concern with the possibility of error (PE §26). Just as we must make room for the possibility of local error in an individual’s conscious experience, so too we have to allow for the possibility of systematic error within an individual’s conscious experience. But just as the idealist explains the possibility of local individual error against the background of larger patterns in the individual’s experience, so too she must ex

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective