Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The explanatory demand is therefore satisfied by contextu... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Generalism about reasons is not supported by the demand that differing valences of a feature across cases must be explained.

    The explanatory demand is therefore satisfied by contextual narrative accounts without requiring the kind of exceptionless principles generalism posits.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Context-specific narratives capture causally relevant details that universal principles necessarily abstract away or ignore.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Human understanding of complex phenomena (ethics, history, psychology) typically requires grasping particular circumstances, not just rules.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Demanding exceptionless principles creates an artificial explanatory burden that nature may not actually impose.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Narrative accounts without principled constraints risk ad-hoc post-hoc reasoning that explains anything and therefore explains nothing.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Context-dependence alone provides no basis for distinguishing genuine explanations from mere descriptions of what happened.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If explanations need not reflect underlying principles, predictive power and applicability to novel cases become theoretically impossible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Context-dependence alone provides no basis for distinguishing genuine explanatio...Context-specific narratives capture causally relevant details that universal pri...Demanding exceptionless principles creates an artificial explanatory burden that...Generalism about reasons is not supported by the demand that differing valences ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Human understanding of complex phenomena (ethics, history, psychology) typically...If explanations need not reflect underlying principles, predictive power and app...Narrative accounts without principled constraints risk ad-hoc post-hoc reasoning...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit