Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The hottest, poorest, and most agriculturally dependent c... — Carmelics
    Home/Environmental Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The international climate change regime is structurally unjust toward the poorest nations.

    The hottest, poorest, and most agriculturally dependent countries have contributed the least to greenhouse gas emissions.

    Environmental EthicsProblem of Evil
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Environmental EthicsProblem of Evil

    Connections

    2 topics

    Democracy & Governance1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Environmental Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Justice & Punishment
    1 linked

    Related

    Enforceable requirements to reduce emissions continue to be blocked by high-emis...The international climate change regime is structurally unjust toward the poores...These same countries are being harmed first and most severely by global warming.

    Similar

    These same countries are being harmed first and most severely by globa...72%The international climate change regime is structurally unjust toward ...70%Enforceable requirements to reduce emissions continue to be blocked by...69%Greenhouse gas emissions arise primarily from activities that serve im...69%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: publichealth-ethics
    View source passageHide passage
    Perhaps most foundationally, the self-interest reason for nations to engage globally in public health cannot be separated from questions of global structural injustice in international relations more broadly. Many threats to public health, including the threats from climate change, cannot be effectively addressed absent collective global action. However, in today’s global order in which nations differ greatly in wealth and other forms of power, the likelihood that agreements and coordinated acti

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective