Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The hypothesis of a timeless and harmonious Reality provides no consolation for present pains and cannot serve as a basis for practical or moral comfort.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Consolation requires that one can experience the comforting reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Experience is necessarily temporal; a timeless Reality is therefore one that humans cannot experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The world of daily life remains wholly unaffected by the alleged timeless Reality and proceeds as if that Reality did not exist.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Bradley's Absolute, as a timeless whole, cannot redeem particular finite suffering without collapsing the distinction between Appearance and Reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If evil is 'absorbed' into a higher harmony, the particularity of suffering is annihilated rather than consoled, making the remedy indistinguishable from annihilation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Genuine consolation requires the preservation of the suffering subject's identity, which a monistic dissolution into timeless Reality structurally cannot provide.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.William James argued in 'A Pluralistic Universe' that block-universe absolutism renders moral striving meaningless because outcomes are already eternally fixed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A timeless Reality in which all discord is already harmonized eliminates the normative gap between present evil and future good that makes moral effort intelligible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Without that normative gap, the claim that present suffering is merely apparent provides no action-guiding content and therefore fails the pragmatic criterion of meaningful belief.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.