Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The independence of certain set-theoretic statements from... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Lévy hierarchy Σ_n ∪ Π_n in set theory does not collapse at the first level

    The independence of certain set-theoretic statements from ZFC (Cohen 1963) means hierarchy non-collapse may itself be a model-relative rather than absolute fact.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Cohen's forcing technique produces multiple models of ZFC with different cardinal relationships, demonstrating that hierarchy collapse/non-collapse is model-dependent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If a property holds in some models of ZFC but not others, it cannot be an absolute fact about the mathematical universe independent of framework choice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.ZFC's incompleteness regarding CH and similar statements suggests our axioms underdetermine the actual structure of the cumulative hierarchy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Model-relativity of truth differs fundamentally from model-relativity of *provability*: statements may be absolutely true even if unprovable in ZFC.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Hierarchy non-collapse describes a property of V itself (the intended universe), not merely of formal theories or their models of set theory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Independence results show ZFC is incomplete, but incompleteness does not entail that all undecidable statements lack objective truth values about V.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Cohen's forcing technique produces multiple models of ZFC with different cardina...Hierarchy non-collapse describes a property of V itself (the intended universe),...If a property holds in some models of ZFC but not others, it cannot be an absolu...Independence results show ZFC is incomplete, but incompleteness does not entail ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Model-relativity of truth differs fundamentally from model-relativity of *provab...The Lévy hierarchy Σ_n ∪ Π_n in set theory does not collapse at the first levelZFC's incompleteness regarding CH and similar statements suggests our axioms und...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit