Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The inference from 'Act A is a lie' to 'Act A is wrong' i... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The inference from 'Act A is a lie' to 'Act A is wrong' is criterial evidence, not causal or standard inductive evidence.

    The inference from 'Act A is a lie' to 'Act A is wrong' is not grounded in any empirical generalization about lies.

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Lying does not cause wrongness.The inference from 'Act A is a lie' to 'Act A is wrong' is criterial evidence, n...

    Similar

    The inference from 'Act A is a lie' to 'Act A is wrong' is not a deduc...93%The inference from 'Act A is a lie' to 'Act A is wrong' shares key fea...92%The inference from 'Act A is a lie' to 'Act A is wrong' is criterial e...91%Like a standard inductive argument, the strength of the inference from...88%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: beardsley-aesthetics
    View source passageHide passage
    for A might be right even so, when all ethically relevant factors are taken into account. If A helps to save innocent people’s lives, for example, it’s right—actually right, as Ross says—even though it’s a lie. Nor is the relation between (L) and (W) causal or inductive. Lying doesn’t cause wrongness, and although it might be that most (or even all) lies are all-things-considered wrong—actually wrong—it might be that most (or even all) lies aren’t all-things-considered wrong—actually wrong. Rega

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective