Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The judgment of taste involved in judging an ideal of beauty is not a purely aesthetic judgment but a partly intellectualized judgment of taste.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The aesthetic idea, as Kant conceives it, outstrips any determinate concept while still orienting aesthetic judgment toward rational ends.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A judgment can involve rational normativity without thereby importing a determinate intellectual concept that compromises its aesthetic purity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, the ideal of beauty can demand rational agreement without crossing the threshold into intellectualized judgment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Schiller argues in the Kallias letters that beauty is freedom in appearance, meaning moral purposiveness is aesthetically embodied, not conceptually appended.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If moral content is sensuously expressed rather than conceptually imposed, the judgment tracking it remains aesthetic in character throughout.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.A purely aesthetic judgment of taste involves no concept and yields only subjective purposiveness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Judging an ideal of beauty requires reference to a concept of objective purposiveness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Any judgment that incorporates a concept of objective purposiveness is partly intellectual rather than purely aesthetic.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.