Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The kind of awareness of sensations that involves the app... — Carmelics
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Conceptual awareness of sensations cannot serve as a nondoxastic foundation that confers justification on beliefs without itself needing justification

    The kind of awareness of sensations that involves the application of concepts just is one's knowledge of one's experiences — that is, one's justified, true, unGettiered appearance belief

    Perception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Perception

    Key Terms

    Appearance belief
    A belief about perceptual appearances.
    Gettier case(Used to challenge the tripartite analysis of knowledge as justified true belief)
    A scenario in which an agent has a justified true belief that nonetheless fails to constitute knowledge
    application of concepts(explains how we organize and understand our sensations)
    Using ideas or categories you already know to make sense of something new—like recognizing a color as 'red' because you understand what red is.
    awareness of sensations(describes the starting point of understanding your own experiences)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The ability to notice and pay attention to what you're feeling or experiencing, like being conscious that you're in pain or seeing red.
    justified(Epistemological discussion of Socratic wisdom in The Apology)
    Having beliefs formed with adequate evidence or through reliable belief-forming processes, distinct from the ability to demonstrate one's justification to an interrogator.
    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.
    knowledge of one's experiences(what the statement claims awareness of sensations really is)
    Actually understanding and being able to think about what's happening to you, rather than just passively feeling it.
    true(Dietrich's account of the interchangeability of being, truth, and goodness)
    A thing as ordered to the intellect.

    Related

    A nondoxastic foundation must confer justification on beliefs without itself bei...A state that is itself a justified belief is not a nondoxastic foundationConceptual awareness of sensations cannot serve as a nondoxastic foundation that...

    Similar

    Non-conceptual awareness of sensations does not account for the justif...88%Non-conceptual awareness of sensations cannot account for the justific...88%There is a kind of awareness of sensations that does not involve learn...84%Human perception is by its nature infused with concepts and beliefs.84%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: perception-episprob
    View source passageHide passage
    Perhaps the most important problem for this view concerns the relevant understanding of seemings, or perceptual experience. It is clear that seemings must be non-belief states of some sort, as their epistemological role is to confer justification on basic beliefs, and the latter wouldn’t be basic if seemings were themselves beliefs. The “Sellarsian dilemma” is a famous argument, due perhaps as much to BonJour (1978, 1985) as to Sellars (1956), which claims that “experience” and “seemings” and th

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective