Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The labor-mixing principle, if valid, should apply consis... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→If labor-mixing generates property claims, it should generate co-ownership claims over already-owned objects, not just claims over unowned objects

    The labor-mixing principle, if valid, should apply consistently regardless of the prior ownership status of the object

    Rights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & Liberty

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment2 linked

    Related

    If labor-mixing generates property claims, it should generate co-ownership claim...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Mixing one's labor with an already-owned object is no different in kind from mix...
    Therefore restricting labor-mixing claims to unowned goods is arbitrary

    Similar

    If labor-mixing generates property claims, it should generate co-owner...84%It is not self-evident why the result of labor mixing should be a gain...81%When labor is mixed with objects held in common, the individual's owne...81%If mixing owned labor with unowned things generated ownership, then mi...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: libertarianism
    View source passageHide passage
    This argument suffers from well-known problems. For instance, since laboring is an activity, the idea of mixing it with an object seems at best a metaphor for something else. But in that case, the argument is incomplete: we still need to know what really grounds property rights (Waldron 1988). More importantly, it simply is not true that mixing something owned with something unowned is sufficient for appropriation. As Nozick pointed out, if I pour a can of tomato juice that I own into the unowne

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective