Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The law of contradiction is provable from the remaining a... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The law of contradiction is provable from the remaining axioms of the intuitionistic system H without taking it as a primitive.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Negation can be defined as A implying 0 = 1.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Ex falso can be stated as '0 = 1 implies A'.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The remaining axioms of H are sufficient to derive the law of contradiction given this definition of negation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Ex falso can be stated as '0 = 1 implies A'.Negation can be defined as A implying 0 = 1.The remaining axioms of H are sufficient to derive the law of contradiction give...

    Similar

    The law of contradiction is a philosophical axiom (an indispensable pr...89%The law of non-contradiction is the most fundamental law of logic and ...84%The remaining axioms of H are sufficient to derive the law of contradi...84%Therefore the law of contradiction must be recognized for any norm to ...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: logic-intuitionistic
    View source passageHide passage
    Griss contested Brouwer’s use of negation, objecting to both the law of contradiction and ex falso. It is worth noting that negation is not really needed for intuitionistic mathematics since \(0 = 1\) is a known contradiction so \(\neg A\) can be defined by \(A \rightarrow 0 = 1.\) Then ex falso can be stated as \(0 = 1 \rightarrow A,\) and the law of contradiction is provable from the remaining axioms of \(\mathbf{H}.\)
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit