Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The remaining axioms of H are sufficient to derive the la... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The law of contradiction is provable from the remaining axioms of the intuitionistic system H without taking it as a primitive.

    The remaining axioms of H are sufficient to derive the law of contradiction given this definition of negation.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Ex falso can be stated as '0 = 1 implies A'.Negation can be defined as A implying 0 = 1.The law of contradiction is provable from the remaining axioms of the intuitioni...

    Similar

    The principle of contradiction holds that the negation of a false prop...85%The law of contradiction is provable from the remaining axioms of the ...84%The law of contradiction is a philosophical axiom (an indispensable pr...84%The law of non-contradiction is the most fundamental law of logic and ...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-intuitionistic
    View source passageHide passage
    Griss contested Brouwer’s use of negation, objecting to both the law of contradiction and ex falso. It is worth noting that negation is not really needed for intuitionistic mathematics since \(0 = 1\) is a known contradiction so \(\neg A\) can be defined by \(A \rightarrow 0 = 1.\) Then ex falso can be stated as \(0 = 1 \rightarrow A,\) and the law of contradiction is provable from the remaining axioms of \(\mathbf{H}.\)

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective