Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The New Testament scriptures argue irreversible destruction of the wicked
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons Against
3 perspectives
Reason against 1 of 3
?
1.
In Scripture, the Apostle Paul argues destruction of the wicked
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If the above is true, Scripture argues irreversible destruction of the wicked
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason against 2 of 3
?
1.
In Scripture, Peter argues destruction of the wicked
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If the above is true, Scripture argues irreversible destruction of the wicked
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason against 3 of 3
?
1.
Every reference to the fate of the lost in the New Testament argues irreversible destruction of the wicked
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If the above is true, then the New Testament scriptures argue irreversible destruction of the wicked
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.