Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The norm 'Believe that ripe tomatoes are red' is not a ph... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The norm 'Believe that ripe tomatoes are red' is not a philosophical axiom

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.An axiom is a norm whose recognition is a precondition of universal validity in any possible world
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A world is conceivable in which ripe tomatoes are blue rather than red
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.In such a world, recognizing the norm 'Believe that ripe tomatoes are red' would not be a precondition of universal validity
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Perceptual norms grounded in stable causal-biological facts about human color vision constitute a privileged epistemic class distinct from contingent beliefs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Wittgenstein's 'On Certainty' establishes that some empirical propositions function as hinges—practical axioms immune to doubt within a form of life.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The norm to believe ripe tomatoes are red functions as such a hinge for color-language acquisition, making it axiomatically prior within human epistemic practice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The supporting argument conflates metaphysical conceivability with epistemic normativity, a distinction Kripke's necessary a posteriori truths makes obligatory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If 'water is H2O' is necessarily true despite blue-water worlds being conceivable, color-constitution facts about natural kinds may carry similar modal weight.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A norm tracking a necessary a posteriori truth about a natural kind retains axiomatic status even if superficially contingent-seeming worlds are imaginable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility2 linked

    Related

    A norm tracking a necessary a posteriori truth about a natural kind retains axio...A world is conceivable in which ripe tomatoes are blue rather than redAn axiom is a norm whose recognition is a precondition of universal validity in ...If 'water is H2O' is necessarily true despite blue-water worlds being conceivabl...
    +5 moreShow less
    In such a world, recognizing the norm 'Believe that ripe tomatoes are red' would...Perceptual norms grounded in stable causal-biological facts about human color vi...The norm to believe ripe tomatoes are red functions as such a hinge for color-la...The supporting argument conflates metaphysical conceivability with epistemic nor...Wittgenstein's 'On Certainty' establishes that some empirical propositions funct...

    Similar

    In such a world, recognizing the norm 'Believe that ripe tomatoes are ...89%The tomato is red relative to Nonvert and green relative to Invert (ra...79%A world is conceivable in which ripe tomatoes are blue rather than red74%The tomato looks red-for-Nonvert to Nonvert, so Nonvert's experience i...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: neo-kantianism
    View source passageHide passage
    The critical method, on the other hand, begins with the assumption that there are universal, absolute values which all subjects ought to recognize and conform to. It postulates a “normal consciousness whose principles must be recognized, insofar as anything at all is to have universal validity” (Windelband 1883: 280). This normal consciousness,[18] inasmuch as it embodies a norm, is not an empirically real subject and cannot be investigated using the genetic method. The “axioms”, which form th
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit