Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that The norm 'Believe that ripe tomatoes are red' is not a philosophical axiom

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Perceptual norms grounded in stable causal-biological facts about human color vision constitute a privileged epistemic class distinct from contingent beliefs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Wittgenstein's 'On Certainty' establishes that some empirical propositions function as hinges—practical axioms immune to doubt within a form of life.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The norm to believe ripe tomatoes are red functions as such a hinge for color-language acquisition, making it axiomatically prior within human epistemic practice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The supporting argument conflates metaphysical conceivability with epistemic normativity, a distinction Kripke's necessary a posteriori truths makes obligatory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If 'water is H2O' is necessarily true despite blue-water worlds being conceivable, color-constitution facts about natural kinds may carry similar modal weight.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A norm tracking a necessary a posteriori truth about a natural kind retains axiomatic status even if superficially contingent-seeming worlds are imaginable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.An axiom is a norm whose recognition is a precondition of universal validity in any possible world
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A world is conceivable in which ripe tomatoes are blue rather than red
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.In such a world, recognizing the norm 'Believe that ripe tomatoes are red' would not be a precondition of universal validity
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.