Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The opportunity to choose is not valuable for Curious — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Contractualists who cite the Value of Choice cannot justify intuitive principles in the Hazardous Waste case

    The opportunity to choose is not valuable for Curious

    ConsequentialismMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityConsequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Social Contract1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Contractualists who cite the Value of Choice cannot justify intuitive principles...The opportunity to choose clearly makes Curious worse-off

    Similar

    The opportunity to choose clearly makes Curious worse-off88%Pleasure is not the true or ultimate measure of choice-worthiness80%One should choose readily available pleasures rather than wait for a s...77%Rational choice requires regarding the chosen action as good in some w...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: contractualism
    View source passageHide passage
    Critics argue that contractualists who cite the Value of Choice cannot justify intuitive principles in the Hazardous Waste case. The opportunity to choose is not valuable for Curious. On the contrary, that opportunity clearly makes her worse-off! Consider the following variant of the original case.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective