Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that The piece of clay c is absolutely identical to s1 on day 1, and c is absolutely identical to s2 on day 2.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
If c = s1 on day 1 and c = s2 on day 2, then by transitivity of identity, s1 = s2, which contradicts their distinct modal and temporal properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
s1 and s2 differ in their essential properties: s1 can survive being flattened while s2, a different statue, cannot—violating Leibniz's Law.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Constitution is a non-symmetric, non-transitive relation distinct from identity, as Lynne Rudder Baker argues in 'Persons and Bodies' (2000).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Conflating constitution with identity collapses the explanatory distinction between what something is made of and what kind of thing it is.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Constitution is absolute identity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
c constitutes s1 on day 1 and c constitutes s2 on day 2.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.