Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The premise that a theory must be more informative in ord... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The premise that a theory must be more informative in order to be more explanatory should be rejected

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Special Relativity Theory is not obviously more informative than Lorentz's æther theory in the relevant sense
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Yet Special Relativity Theory is regarded as more explanatory than Lorentz's æther theory
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A theory can be more explanatory without being more informative
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    2 topics

    Causation1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    A theory can be more explanatory without being more informativeSpecial Relativity Theory is not obviously more informative than Lorentz's æther...Yet Special Relativity Theory is regarded as more explanatory than Lorentz's æth...

    Similar

    A theory can be more explanatory without being more informative89%It is part of the meaning of 'explanation' that if one theory is more ...83%A more informative theory cannot be more likely to be true than a less...81%IBE claims that more explanatory theories receive greater inductive or...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: abduction
    View source passageHide passage
    It is important to note, however, that in any other kind of case than the “paradigm” one, the putative elementary point is not obvious at all. For instance, it is entirely unclear in what sense Special Relativity Theory “has more ways of being false” than Lorentz’s version of the æther theory, given that they make the same predictions. And yet the former is generally regarded as being superior, qua explanation, to the latter. (If van Fraassen were to object that the former is not really more inf
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit