Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The presence of hetero-affective inputs does not dissolve... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The autonomy of the 'I' can be neither pure nor rigorous and cannot form the basis for a simple and linear differentiation of the human from the animal.

    The presence of hetero-affective inputs does not dissolve autonomous self-constitution, because autonomy consists in how an agent reflects on and endorses those inputs, not in their absence.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Autonomous self-constitution(as used in metaphysics and philosophy of self)
    The process of building and defining who you are through your own choices and reflections, rather than having your identity completely determined by outside influences.
    Hetero-affective inputs(as used in ethics and philosophy of autonomy)
    Feelings, emotions, or desires that come from outside yourself—like being influenced by other people's moods, social pressure, or things you care about. The prefix 'hetero-' means 'different' or 'from outside,' and 'affective' refers to emotions.
    autonomy(Used to ground worker rights to self-governance in the workplace)
    The right to freely determine one's own actions
    dissolve(as used in philosophical argumentation)
    To break down, weaken, or disappear; in this context, to undermine or remove something's essential quality.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    endorses(in philosophy of action)
    To approve of or genuinely support something as your own belief or desire.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    The autonomy of the 'I' can be neither pure nor rigorous and cannot form the bas...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective