Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    The responsibility for these decisions cannot be offloade... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Non-epistemic values (such as ethical value judgements) legitimately enter into stages internal to scientific reasoning, including data collection and interpretation.

    The responsibility for these decisions cannot be offloaded to non-scientists.

    Moral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral Responsibility

    Connections

    3 topics

    Truth & Knowledge2 linkedConsequentialism1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    Non-epistemic values (such as ethical value judgements) legitimately enter into ...Scientists must make decisions—such as setting thresholds for statistical signif...Such decisions require balancing the acceptability of false positives against fa...

    Similar

    Ultimate responsibility for an action requires either that the action ...72%No scientist works exclusively in a value-free zone of assessing and a...71%Moral responsibility does not require an ability to do otherwise.71%Mobs can be held collectively responsible even though they lack formal...71%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: science-theory-observation
    View source passageHide passage
    Similarly, fine points can be made about the nature of values involved in these various contexts. Such clarification is likely important for determining whether the contribution of certain values in a given context is deleterious or salutary, and in what sense. Douglas (2013) argues that the ‘value’ of internal consistency of a theory and of the empirical adequacy of a theory with respect to the available evidence are minimal criteria for any viable scientific theory (799–800). She contrasts the

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective