Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The right of a commonwealth is determined by the collecti... — Carmelics
    Home/Social Contract
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The right of a commonwealth diminishes as the number of subjects given cause to conspire against it increases.

    The right of a commonwealth is determined by the collective power of a people.

    Social Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Social Contract

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty2 linked

    Related

    The greater the number of subjects who are given cause to conspire against a com...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Social Contract
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The right of a commonwealth diminishes as the number of subjects given cause to ...

    Similar

    For Spinoza, sovereign right is conditioned on and limited by the coll...82%The right of the state is constituted and limited by the power of the ...82%The right of the state is essentially constituted and limited by the p...81%The right of a commonwealth diminishes as the number of subjects given...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: spinoza-political
    View source passageHide passage
    By adhering to a strict naturalism about right and obligation and maintaining that “the sovereign power in a State has right over a subject only in proportion to the excess of its power over that of a subject” (Epistle 50), Spinoza, unlike Hobbes, places the burden of political stability on the sovereign rather than the subject (see Wernham 1958, 27). The commonwealth must be structured so as to promote compliance; when there is excessive vice or non-compliance, the blame must be “laid at the do

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective